MongoDB competitorsClear all
MongoDB's top competitors include Amazon Web Services, MarkLogic, Aerospike, Couchbase, DataStax, Redis Labs, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle and Google.
| Save Comparison |  Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services is a provider of information technology infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services. |  MarkLogic MarkLogic is a company providing an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database platform for data integration. |  Aerospike Aerospike is a fast database – the system of engagement – powering a new class of real-time, context-driven applications that personalize the consumer experience across the Internet. |  Couchbase Couchbase is a company that develops a cloud-based data platform designed to simplify mainframe and relational databases. |  IBM International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is a company providing information technology products and services. |  Microsoft Microsoft is a technology company that develops and supports software, services, and devices. |  Google Google is a multinational corporation that specializes in Internet-related services and products.
| ||||
Founding Date | Founding Date 2007 | Founding Date 2006 | Founding Date 2001 | Founding Date 2009 | Founding Date 2009 | Founding Date 2010 | Founding Date 2011 | Founding Date 1911 | Founding Date 1975 | Founding Date 1977 | Founding Date 1998 |
Type | Type Public | Type Subsidiary | Type Private | Type Private | Type Private | Type Private | Type Private | Type Public | Type Public | Type Public | Type Subsidiary |
Tags | |||||||||||
Locations | Locations New York, US HQ Abl, AR Haymarket, AU Melbourne, AU Melbourne, AU Toronto, CA Vancouver, CA see more | Locations San Carlos, US HQ Sydney, AU Paris, FR Frankfurt Am Main, DE München, DE Shibuya City, JP Utrecht, NL see more | Locations Mountain View, US HQ Bengaluru, IN Or Yehuda, IL London, GB | Locations Santa Clara, US HQ Paris, FR Bengaluru, IN London, GB Manchester, GB San Francisco, US | Locations Mountain View, US HQ Bengaluru, IN Tel Aviv Yafo, IL London, GB Austin, US | Locations Armonk, US HQ Algiers, DZ Luanda, AO Buenos Aires, AR Martínez, AR Oranjestad, AW St Leonards, AU see more | Locations Redwood City, US HQ Buenos Aires, AR Adelaide, AU Brisbane City, AU Canberra, AU Melbourne, AU North Ryde, AU see more | Locations Mountain View, US HQ Buenos Aires, AR Melbourne, AU Sydney, AU Wien, AT Etterbeek, BE São Paulo, BR see more | |||
Employees | Employees 1,81350% increase | Employees N/A | Employees 4742% decrease | Employees 1063% increase | Employees 517 | Employees 5256% decrease | Employees 4001% decrease | Employees 352,6001% increase | Employees 144,00010% increase | Employees 136,0001% decrease | Employees N/A |
Valuation ($) | Valuation ($) 12.5 b | Valuation ($) N/A | Valuation ($) 1.2 b | Valuation ($) N/A | Valuation ($) N/A | Valuation ($) N/A | Valuation ($) N/A | Valuation ($) 108.1 b | Valuation ($) 1.4 t | Valuation ($) 166.4 b | Valuation ($) N/A |
Twitter followers | Twitter followers 348.7 k | Twitter followers 1.8 m | Twitter followers 18.9 k | Twitter followers 7.7 k | Twitter followers 152 k | Twitter followers 106.7 k | Twitter followers 32.2 k | Twitter followers 584.6 k | Twitter followers 8.9 m | Twitter followers 774.2 k | Twitter followers 22.1 m |
Number of tweets (last 30 days) | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 202 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 547 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 26 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 182 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 80 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 46 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 91 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 599 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 200 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 83 | Number of tweets (last 30 days) 845 |
Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 13.4 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 34.4 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 2.5 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 0.6 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 1.4 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 2.7 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 6.9 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 7.5 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 149.1 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 28.4 | Average likes per tweet (last 30 days) 13.8 |
Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 82.18% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 100% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 100% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 60.99% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 100% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 80.43% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 92.31% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 59.93% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 92.5% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 77.11% | Percentage of tweets with engagement (last 30 days) 22.96% |
Alexa Website Rank | Alexa Website Rank 10090 | Alexa Website Rank 12 | Alexa Website Rank 157593 | Alexa Website Rank 345287 | Alexa Website Rank 114576 | Alexa Website Rank 171902 | Alexa Website Rank 100036 | Alexa Website Rank 865 | Alexa Website Rank 25 | Alexa Website Rank 523 | Alexa Website Rank 1 |
Financial | |||||||||||
Revenue (est.) | Revenue (est.) $421.7m (FY, 2020) | Revenue (est.) $25.7b (FY, 2018) | Revenue (est.) N/A | Revenue (est.) N/A | Revenue (est.) N/A | Revenue (est.) N/A | Revenue (est.) $50m (Y, 2018) | Revenue (est.) $77.1b (FY, 2019) | Revenue (est.) $125.8b (FY, 2019) | Revenue (est.) $39.5b (FY, 2019) | Revenue (est.) $75b (FY, 2015) |
Cost of goods | Cost of goods $125.4m (FY, 2020) | Cost of goods N/A | Cost of goods N/A | Cost of goods N/A | Cost of goods N/A | Cost of goods N/A | Cost of goods N/A | Cost of goods $40.7b (FY, 2019) | Cost of goods $42.9b (FY, 2019) | Cost of goods $8b (FY, 2019) | Cost of goods $28.2b (FY, 2015) |
Gross profit | Gross profit $296.4m (FY, 2020) | Gross profit N/A | Gross profit N/A | Gross profit N/A | Gross profit N/A | Gross profit N/A | Gross profit N/A | Gross profit $36.5b (FY, 2019) | Gross profit $82.9b (FY, 2019) | Gross profit $31.5b (FY, 2019) | Gross profit $46.8b (FY, 2015) |
Net income | Net income ($175.5m) (FY, 2020) | Net income N/A | Net income N/A | Net income N/A | Net income N/A | Net income N/A | Net income N/A | Net income $9.4b (FY, 2019) | Net income $39.2b (FY, 2019) | Net income $11.1b (FY, 2019) | Net income $16.3b (FY, 2015) |
Operating ⚠ | |||||||||||
Countries | Countries 100 (Q3, 2020) | Countries N/A | Countries N/A | Countries N/A | Countries N/A | Countries N/A | Countries N/A | Countries 175 (FY, 2019) | Countries 200 (FY, 2018) | Countries N/A | Countries N/A |
Customers | Customers 15.9 k (Q3, 2020) | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers N/A | Customers 430 k (FY, 2019) | Customers N/A |
Data Centers | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers 58 (FY, 2017) | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers N/A | Data Centers 15 (Y, 2018) |
Partners | Partners 1 k (FY, 2018) | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners N/A | Partners 20 k (FY, 2019) | Partners N/A |
Patent Applications (US) | Patent Applications (US) 45 (FY, 2019) | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) 4 (May, 2020) | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A | Patent Applications (US) N/A |
Patents (US) | Patents (US) 15 (FY, 2019) | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) 7 (May, 2020) | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A | Patents (US) N/A |
Trademarks (US) | Trademarks (US) 12 (FY, 2019) | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) 2 (May, 2020) | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A | Trademarks (US) N/A |
Funding | |||||||||||
Latest funding round | Latest funding round N/A | Latest funding round N/A | Latest funding round N/A | Latest funding round $ 32m (6 months ago) | Latest funding round $ 105m (7 days ago) | Latest funding round $ 106m (over 5 years ago) | Latest funding round $ 60m (over 1 year ago) | Latest funding round N/A | Latest funding round N/A | Latest funding round N/A | Latest funding round N/A |
Total funding raised | Total funding raised $ 311m | Total funding raised N/A | Total funding raised $ 187.5m | Total funding raised $ 54m | Total funding raised $ 251m | Total funding raised $ 190m | Total funding raised $ 146.6m | Total funding raised N/A | Total funding raised $ 1m | Total funding raised N/A | Total funding raised $ 36.1m |
For sources of this data, please see the company profile
View company profiles
Amazon Web Services
HQ
Seattle, US
Amazon Web Services is a provider of information technology infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services.
View companyMarkLogic
HQ
San Carlos, US
Employees
474↓ 2% decrease
MarkLogic is a company providing an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database platform for data integration.
View companyAerospike
HQ
Mountain View, US
Employees
106↑ 3% increase
Aerospike is a fast database – the system of engagement – powering a new class of real-time, context-driven applications that personalize the consumer experience across the Internet.
View companyCouchbase
HQ
Santa Clara, US
Employees
517
Couchbase is a company that develops a cloud-based data platform designed to simplify mainframe and relational databases.
View company